map uncertainty
Producing and Leveraging Online Map Uncertainty in Trajectory Prediction
Gu, Xunjiang, Song, Guanyu, Gilitschenski, Igor, Pavone, Marco, Ivanovic, Boris
High-definition (HD) maps have played an integral role in the development of modern autonomous vehicle (AV) stacks, albeit with high associated labeling and maintenance costs. As a result, many recent works have proposed methods for estimating HD maps online from sensor data, enabling AVs to operate outside of previously-mapped regions. However, current online map estimation approaches are developed in isolation of their downstream tasks, complicating their integration in AV stacks. In particular, they do not produce uncertainty or confidence estimates. In this work, we extend multiple state-of-the-art online map estimation methods to additionally estimate uncertainty and show how this enables more tightly integrating online mapping with trajectory forecasting. In doing so, we find that incorporating uncertainty yields up to 50% faster training convergence and up to 15% better prediction performance on the real-world nuScenes driving dataset.
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
Multi-Robot Autonomous Exploration and Mapping Under Localization Uncertainty with Expectation-Maximization
Huang, Yewei, Lin, Xi, Englot, Brendan
We propose an autonomous exploration algorithm designed for decentralized multi-robot teams, which takes into account map and localization uncertainties of range-sensing mobile robots. Virtual landmarks are used to quantify the combined impact of process noise and sensor noise on map uncertainty. Additionally, we employ an iterative expectation-maximization inspired algorithm to assess the potential outcomes of both a local robot's and its neighbors' next-step actions. To evaluate the effectiveness of our framework, we conduct a comparative analysis with state-of-the-art algorithms. The results of our experiments show the proposed algorithm's capacity to strike a balance between curbing map uncertainty and achieving efficient task allocation among robots.
PRISM: Probabilistic Real-Time Inference in Spatial World Models
Mirchev, Atanas, Kayalibay, Baris, Agha, Ahmed, van der Smagt, Patrick, Cremers, Daniel, Bayer, Justin
Moving agents perceive streams of information, typically a mix of RGB images, depth and inertial measurements. Probabilistic generative models [1] are a principled way to formalise the synthesis of this data, and from these models inference can be derived through Bayes' rule. We focus on exactly such inference and target the agent states and the scene map, a problem known as simultaneous localisation and mapping (SLAM). We treat it as a posterior approximation for a given state-space model, such that the combination is useful for model-based control: the posterior inference serves as a state estimator and the predictive state-space model as a simulator with which to plan ahead [2]. To pave the way towards decision making, we believe an inference method should have: a compatible predictive model for both RGB-D images and 6-DoF dynamics; principled state and map uncertainty; real-time performance on commodity hardware; state-of-the-art localisation accuracy. We motivate these requirements further in appendix J. Prominent methods like LSD-SLAM [3], ORB-SLAM [4], DSO [5] have propelled visual SLAM forward, with heavy focus on large-scale localisation. The core of modern large-scale SLAM is maximum a-posteriori (MAP) smoothing in a probabilistic factor graph [6, 7]. At present this demands sparsity assumptions for computational feasibility, which obstructs the tight integration of dense maps and rendering.
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Undirected Networks > Markov Models (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.87)
Information-Theoretic Approach to Efficient Adaptive Path Planning for Mobile Robotic Environmental Sensing
Low, Kian Hsiang (Carnegie Mellon University) | Dolan, John M. (Carnegie Mellon University) | Khosla, Pradeep (Carnegie Mellon University)
Recent research in robot exploration and mapping has focused on sampling environmental hotspot fields. This exploration task is formalized by Low, Dolan, and Khosla (2008) in a sequential decision-theoretic planning under uncertainty framework called MASP. The time complexity of solving MASP approximately depends on the map resolution, which limits its use in large-scale, high-resolution exploration and mapping. To alleviate this computational difficulty, this paper presents an information-theoretic approach to MASP (iMASP) for efficient adaptive path planning; by reformulating the cost-minimizing iMASP as a reward-maximizing problem, its time complexity becomes independent of map resolution and is less sensitive to increasing robot team size as demonstrated both theoretically and empirically. Using the reward-maximizing dual, we derive a novel adaptive variant of maximum entropy sampling, thus improving the induced exploration policy performance. It also allows us to establish theoretical bounds quantifying the performance advantage of optimal adaptive over non-adaptive policies and the performance quality of approximately optimal vs. optimal adaptive policies. We show analytically and empirically the superior performance of iMASP-based policies for sampling the log-Gaussian process to that of policies for the widely-used Gaussian process in mapping the hotspot field. Lastly, we provide sufficient conditions that, when met, guarantee adaptivity has no benefit under an assumed environment model.
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.14)
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- (2 more...)